which did fate influence in the memory for Hermon, its Horoskop, how we saw at the end of the preceding chapter, became so carefully again developed by Titus Pitenius? Pitenius, how practically all practicing astro+lied, does, at least not on the same piece of the Papyrusses does not commit itself. Should we turn where then Weekly Horoscopes us? The astrological manuals? If not for Hermon in particular, then that is safe, where we find basic rules and procedures, us from heavenly given somehow lead configuration to its implied result in the life of the human topic, the native ``the Horoskops. ' ' Unfortunately not so. As practical aids for the discovery directly and clear results (X happens, Y) the manuals you are not useless. In an elegant experiment in chapter 5 of their old Astrology (1994: 114-42) Tamsyn bar clay/tone examined systematically the configurations in the Horoskop of Charles, prince of Wales, against results forecast for these Weekly Horoscopesconfigurations by two old authorities, Dorotheus of Sidon, which wrote Maternus, which wrote into the quarter into the first century cerium and the Firmicus. The problem was not the fact that these author supplied wrong forecasts for Charless the life up to now but supplied it a mass of the incompatible results. Barmherzig and I think with good reason, stated bar clay/tone that Dorotheus and Firmicus were not intentional a preserving of their bets, around the practical man to permit to reconcile looking back any set of data with any result. Rather it (again with good reason in my opinion) maintains that the manuals together served different purpose. They were not self production manuals; they were show you the pieces, sketched, around the depth and the detail of the masters to exhibit knowledge. In any case Astrologie was and is an art, not a science, to be compiled by the book learning. They cannot learn no Weekly Horoscopesmore to interpret for A Horoskop with ability and view of a manual than you can learn to drive you a car from the same kind of the written source. Drive and genethlialogy are evenly practical abilities. The manuals give then too much information about possible results, to not too little. I would like a further reason for this to suggest superabundance of the cause and effect conditions in astrological literature over it and among them Exhibitionismus on the one hand or structure of a Failsafesystems on the other one. Each Horoskop, inside the direction of each configuration of the skies at a certain birth, is contained of many conditions, those between achieves heavenly natures of the different kinds (planet, indication, places/in the middle). Topic to certain delimitations (e.g. the close presence of the Mercury and Venus on the Sun), each of the seven planets can be found in any aspect to any other planet. Aspected the planets, e.g. to Venus inside aspect of quadrature to Mars, indication can be found, those is even in the aspect of quadrature with one another in all possible pairs (e.g. in the bull and in lions). The indications and the planets rotate together daily against the locally specified circle of the twelve places; consequently each possible indication can occupy and any planet any place, provided only that, which they do in such a way in the correct order. Last we must represent dodekatemories in a complete landlord of other produced conditions factor by secondary designing like the expressions, the lots and those. Obviously the total number conditions, of those everyone carries its own meaning for good, or ill, is indeed very large. During not endlessly, the number conditions and therefore the number of predictable meanings, which in a Horoskop can be read, is in practice inexhaustible. |
|||
